Here, the Seventh generation model allows for 192 gigabytes at the high end, a clear advantage for server applications requiring a higher level of multitasking or particularly memory-intensive applications.īoth servers offer Serial ATA and SAS type controller interfaces, meaning affordable and high speed hard disk drive options for storage. The Sixth Generation D元60 has a standard memory installation of a relatively low four gigabytes, but does allow for a full memory expansion at the high end of 144 gigabytes. Both D元60s allow for two processors, meaning plenty of performance potential regardless of generation. 13 gigahertz improvement over the prior model.
The Seventh Generation improves slightly with the Intel Xeon E5506 base model, which allows for 2.13 GHz clock speeds, a. The Sixth Generation supports an Intel Xeon E5504 processor type, which is a quad-core model with a clock speed of 2 gigahertz even. It is worth noting that the D元60, as a base model, has been well received for its powerful standard processing capabilities. Following below is a comparison based upon core configurations. As such, each generation features a configuration which is well balanced for a range of functionality rather than one specific focus. The D元60 base models are recognized and intended for small business to mid-range corporate level applications. The server is part of HP’s successful ProLiant line, bringing the standard bonuses of long-term reliability and scalability so common to the ProLiant brand. To begin with, it is a good idea to establish a baseline and point of reference for the D元60. We will examine the key differences between the Sixth Generation and Seventh Generation to see just what the newer generation brings to the table. Here, we will pay particular attention to two generations of HP’s most successful server series, the ProLiand D元60. It’s particularly troublesome when the technology poses a large financial investment, as is often the case with servers. As many a smartphone user can attest to, there’s little more annoying than finding your recently “new and improved” model has been replaced an even newer and more-so improved model. However, the rapid rate of innovation does produce a sometimes detrimental effect: quick rates of succession and, consequently, hardware which is rendered obsolete.
With the rapid rate of evolution in terms of performance, we have seen the capacities of our computer implements increase drastically in the span of a few short decades. As far as industry development goes, very few industries see the kind of large scale and substantial amount of changes which the computer industry does.
0 kommentar(er)
